Supreme Court Rejects Appeal in New Jersey COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Case
Background
In April 2021, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy issued an executive order requiring all healthcare workers in the state to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Four New Jersey nurses, Katie Sczesny, Jamie Rumfield, Debra Hagen, and Mariette Vitti, filed a lawsuit challenging the mandate, arguing that it violated their religious freedoms and right to bodily autonomy.
Lower Court Ruling
In August 2021, a federal judge dismissed the nurses' lawsuit, finding that the mandate was a reasonable and necessary public health measure. The judge also ruled that the mandate did not violate the nurses' constitutional rights.
Supreme Court Appeal
The nurses appealed the lower court's decision to the Supreme Court. In their petition for certiorari, the nurses argued that the lower court had erred in finding that the mandate was a reasonable and necessary public health measure. They also argued that the mandate violated their constitutional right to free exercise of religion.
Supreme Court Decision
On November 14, 2023, the Supreme Court denied the nurses' petition for certiorari. This means that the lower court's decision will stand, and the New Jersey COVID-19 vaccine mandate for healthcare workers will remain in effect.
Reaction
The Supreme Court's decision was met with mixed reactions. Supporters of the mandate praised the decision, arguing that it was a necessary step to protect public health. Opponents of the mandate criticized the decision, arguing that it was an infringement on individual liberty.
Implications
The Supreme Court's decision has significant implications for the ongoing debate over vaccine mandates. The decision suggests that courts are likely to uphold vaccine mandates that are narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling public health interest.
F.A.Q.
-
The New Jersey COVID-19 vaccine mandate requires all healthcare workers in the state to be vaccinated against COVID-19. The mandate is in effect as of November 14, 2023.
-
The Supreme Court did not provide a specific reason for denying the nurses' petition for certiorari. However, the Court is generally reluctant to grant certiorari in cases where there is no split among the lower courts. In this case, there was no split among the lower courts on the issue of whether vaccine mandates are constitutional.
-
The Supreme Court's decision suggests that courts are likely to uphold vaccine mandates that are narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling public health interest. The decision also provides some guidance for states and localities that are considering implementing vaccine mandates.